{"id":24581,"date":"2013-01-22T20:37:52","date_gmt":"2013-01-23T01:37:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.windturbinesyndrome.com\/static\/static\/?p=24581"},"modified":"2013-01-22T20:37:52","modified_gmt":"2013-01-23T01:37:52","slug":"provinces-chief-medical-officer-lying-about-wind-turbine-syndrome-ontario","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.windturbinesyndrome.com\/static\/2013\/provinces-chief-medical-officer-lying-about-wind-turbine-syndrome-ontario\/","title":{"rendered":"Province’s Chief Medical Officer lying about Wind Turbine Syndrome? (Ontario)"},"content":{"rendered":"

Editor’s note<\/em>: \u00a0The following is an Open Letter from a member of the Ontario Provincial Parliament to the Chief Medical Officer of Ontario, Canada. \u00a0Read between the lines of the letter, and you smell something rotten in the Chief Medical Officer’s office.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

.<\/span>
\nJanuary 21, 2013<\/p>\n

Arlene King, MD
\nChief Medical Officer of Health
\nProvince of Ontario
\nCanada<\/p>\n

Dear Dr. King:<\/p>\n

I am writing to you today to express my growing apprehension over the revelations arising from recent Freedom of Information requests that were released. In November 2012, emails from the Ministry of the Environment, released through the FOI process, reveal that provincial field officers had confirmed adverse health effects from wind turbine noise as far back as 2009, and were working on an abatement plan to assist affected residents. The released documents indicate that, in response to a redacted email from government staff, the MOE officers agreed to stand down.<\/p>\n

I also have concerns with another FOI document I received, in which Q&A\u2019s were prepared in response to your report, The Potential Health Effects of Wind Turbines. In one section of these Q&A\u2019s, the track changes indicated that you should \u201cadd the word direct as studies would show a link through annoyance.\u201d As the Chief Medical Officer of Health, I am sure you are aware that the World Health Organization has determined that annoyance is a health effect of wind turbines.<\/p>\n

In another section of the Q&A\u2019s document, this statement was made in relation to health and wind turbines: \u201cthere are no known indirect links.\u201d Except, in the track changes comment box it said, \u201cNot really true. The link between perceived noise and symptoms is probably linked to annoyance. The link with annoyance should be recognized.<\/p>\n

The last section I would like to draw your attention to is one more Q&A. One answer stated: \u201cAlthough some people living near wind turbines report symptoms such as dizziness, headaches and sleep disturbance, available scientific evidence does not demonstrate a causal link to wind turbines noise.\u201d The track changes of this comment tells a different story, where you were told, \u201cthis answer isn\u2019t credible. Either fess up to the annoyance link or delete.<\/p>\n

Dr. King, Dr. Gloria Rachamin acknowledged under oath in the Kent Breeze wind farm case that your study did not look at the indirect health effects of wind turbines. These indirect health effects are the ones that cause the sleeplessness, depression, dizziness, headaches among other health problems.<\/p>\n

I am asking you today to acknowledge publicly that your report did not study the indirect health effects of wind turbines. I also have many questions surrounding not only your report, but health complaints that were received by either the Ministry of the Environment, Energy or Health and Long-Term Care. For one, did the Ministry of Environment advise your office that complaints about wind turbines and health were being received? Were you contacted to investigate any of these complaints? Why were any of the reports from MOE field officers in 2009 not included in your 2010 report?<\/p>\n

Respectfully, I ask that you review your 2010 report for clarifications between the direct\/indirect link between wind turbines and health effects. I can respectfully acknowledge that the likelihood of a wind turbine blade falling off and hurting someone (a direct link) is highly improbable, but the valid health effects (indirect links) need to be studied so we can help families who have been displaced from their homes and are dealing with serious health consequences. I am sure that we can agree that the health and well-being of Ontario families is first and foremost for both of us.<\/p>\n

I appreciate your time to review my correspondence, and I and many Ontario families await your response.<\/p>\n

Sincerely,<\/p>\n

Lisa Thompson, MPP-\u2028Huron-Bruce*<\/p>\n

*MPP = Member of Provincial Parliament<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Editor’s note: \u00a0The following is an Open Letter from a member of the Ontario Provincial Parliament to the Chief Medical Officer of Ontario, Canada. \u00a0Read between the lines of the letter, and you smell something rotten in the Chief Medical Officer’s office. . January 21, 2013 Arlene King, MD Chief Medical Officer of Health Province of Ontario Canada Dear Dr. King: I am writing to you today to express my growing apprehension over the revelations arising from recent Freedom of Information requests that were released. In November 2012, emails from the Ministry of the Environment, released through the FOI process, reveal that provincial field officers had confirmed adverse health effects from wind turbine noise as far back as 2009, and were working on an abatement plan to assist affected residents. The released documents indicate that, in response to a redacted email from government staff, the MOE officers agreed to stand down. I also have concerns with another FOI document I received, in which Q&A\u2019s were prepared in response to your report, The Potential Health Effects of Wind Turbines. In one section of these Q&A\u2019s, the track changes indicated that you should \u201cadd the word direct as studies would show a link through annoyance.\u201d As the Chief Medical Officer of Health, I am sure you are aware that the World Health Organization has determined that annoyance is a health effect of wind turbines. In another section of the Q&A\u2019s document, this statement was made in relation to health and wind turbines: \u201cthere are no known indirect links.\u201d Except, in the track changes comment box it said, \u201cNot really true. The link between perceived noise and symptoms is probably linked to annoyance. The link with annoyance should be recognized. The last section I would like to draw your attention to is oneRead More…<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[171,157,163,16,170],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.windturbinesyndrome.com\/static\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24581"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.windturbinesyndrome.com\/static\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.windturbinesyndrome.com\/static\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.windturbinesyndrome.com\/static\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.windturbinesyndrome.com\/static\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24581"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.windturbinesyndrome.com\/static\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24581\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.windturbinesyndrome.com\/static\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24581"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.windturbinesyndrome.com\/static\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24581"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.windturbinesyndrome.com\/static\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24581"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}